netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Implement multiqueue virtio-net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OF7E044823.F6B1C64E-ON65257798.00338331-65257798.0033DC0D@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:58:46 +0530
From:	Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	anthony@...emonkey.ws, davem@...emloft.net, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Implement multiqueue virtio-net

Hi Michael,

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote on 09/08/2010 01:43:26 PM:

> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:58:59PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> > 1. mq RX patch is also complete - plan to submit once TX is OK.
>
> It's good that you split patches, I think it would be interesting to see
> the RX patches at least once to complete the picture.
> You could make it a separate patchset, tag them as RFC.

OK, I need to re-do some parts of it, since I started the TX only
branch a couple of weeks earlier and the RX side is outdated. I
will try to send that out in the next couple of days, as you say
it will help to complete the picture. Reasons to send it only TX
now:

- Reduce size of patch and complexity
- I didn't get much improvement on multiple RX patch (netperf from
  host -> guest), so needed some time to figure out the reason and
  fix it.

Thanks,

- KK

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html