[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100909090816.GA7450@ff.dom.local>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:08:17 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jesse@...ira.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: inet_add_protocol() can use cmpxchg()
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 07:24:53AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 07:09:26AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:55:45AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > Le jeudi 09 septembre 2010 ?? 06:42 +0000, Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
> > > > Of course, each case is different, but generally I understand Jesse's
> > > > concern. Smaller data section argument shouldn't be enough. There is
> > > > some reason we do it in C not asm, and there is some cost of
> > > > unreadable code too.
> > >
> > > Sure, but is cmpxchg() really not readable for you ? ;)
> >
> > Just like for Jesse: "this takes a little more thought". ;-)
>
> But more exactly, it's not about this one line, but the time you need
> when reading this after some time to tell: yes, this place is properly
> locked for sure.
And most exactly, without "after some time" I couldn't tell this
either. Is seems some barriers might have been changed, but I might
be wrong. Anyway, it would be nice to have some comment on that in
the changelog.
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists