[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1284046423.2589.188.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:33:43 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next-2.6] tunnels: missing rcu_assign_pointer()
xfrm4_tunnel_register() & xfrm6_tunnel_register() should
use rcu_assign_pointer() to make sure previous writes
(to handler->next) are committed to memory before chain
insertion.
deregister functions dont need a particular barrier.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
---
No risk of crash, because handler->next is NULL before register()
call, but a possibility of packet being dropped.
net/ipv4/tunnel4.c | 2 +-
net/ipv6/tunnel6.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tunnel4.c b/net/ipv4/tunnel4.c
index df59d16..9a17bd2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tunnel4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tunnel4.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ int xfrm4_tunnel_register(struct xfrm_tunnel *handler, unsigned short family)
}
handler->next = *pprev;
- *pprev = handler;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*pprev, handler);
ret = 0;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tunnel6.c b/net/ipv6/tunnel6.c
index 3177fe0..d986472 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tunnel6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tunnel6.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ int xfrm6_tunnel_register(struct xfrm6_tunnel *handler, unsigned short family)
}
handler->next = *pprev;
- *pprev = handler;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*pprev, handler);
ret = 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists