[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:45:05 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>
Subject: [RFC] bnx2x: Insane RX rings
So I have a small dev machine, 4GB of ram,
a dual E5540 cpu (quad core, 2 threads per core),
so a total of 16 threads.
Two ethernet ports, eth0 and eth1,
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM57711E 10Gigabit PCIe
02:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM57711E 10Gigabit PCIe
bnx2x 0000:02:00.0: eth0: using MSI-X IRQs: sp 68 fp[0] 69 ... fp[15] 84
bnx2x 0000:02:00.1: eth1: using MSI-X IRQs: sp 85 fp[0] 86 ... fp[15] 101
Default configuration :
ethtool -g eth0
Ring parameters for eth0:
Pre-set maximums:
RX: 4078
RX Mini: 0
RX Jumbo: 0
TX: 4078
Current hardware settings:
RX: 4078
RX Mini: 0
RX Jumbo: 0
TX: 4078
Problem is : With 16 RX queues per device , thats 4078*16*2Kbytes per
ethernet port.
Total :
skbuff_head_cache 130747 131025 256 15 1 : tunables 120 60 8 : slabdata 8735 8735 40
size-2048 130866 130888 2048 2 1 : tunables 24 12 8 : slabdata 65444 65444 28
Thats about 300 Mbytes of memory, just in case some network trafic will occur.
Lets do something about that ?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists