[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C8F1F80.5050505@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:08:48 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Masayuki Ohtake <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>
CC: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
meego-dev@...go.com, Morinaga <morinaga526@....okisemi.com>,
socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, yong.y.wang@...el.com,
gregkh@...e.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, qi.wang@...el.com,
andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_CAN driver to 2.6.35
On 09/14/2010 02:46 AM, Masayuki Ohtake wrote:
>>>> - implement NAPI
>>> Since Topcliff CAN HW register has only single rx buffer,
>>> I think NAPI is unnecessary.
>
>> Doesn't matter. Please try to implement it.
>
> Our CAN driver must pull received data from CAN-HW rx buffer as fast as it can
> so that the received data is not over-written by next received data.
> In case of implemented with NAPI,
> since NAPI has time-lagging after receiving first packet,
> probability of over-written(discarded) buffer is to be high.
> Thus, for our CAN HW, we should NOT implement with NAPI but normal "netif_rx".
Okay, point taken.
Regarding the one and only rx buffer. Is it a driver or a hardware
limitation?
BTW: Are the datasheets of this CAN core available somewhere?
cheers Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (263 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists