[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100914093758.GA24348@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:37:58 +0400
From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
leandroal@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP packet size and delivery packet decisions
Hello!
> Therefore, how about the following?
This will work.
There is one trap though. If pktsize > max_window, packets never
will be transmitted in normal path, only from probe timer, which
will be very slow.
If we do not want to mess with tcp_write_xmit(), it is still possible
to relax the bound to tp->max_window. (BTW, this even does not
contradict to RFC, only Fs = 1 for tiny windows). This should work:
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 34f5cc2..8cf8cdb 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -501,8 +501,22 @@ extern unsigned int tcp_current_mss(struct sock *sk);
/* Bound MSS / TSO packet size with the half of the window */
static inline int tcp_bound_to_half_wnd(struct tcp_sock *tp, int pktsize)
{
- if (tp->max_window && pktsize > (tp->max_window >> 1))
- return max(tp->max_window >> 1, 68U - tp->tcp_header_len);
+ int cutoff;
+
+ /* When peer uses tiny windows, there is no use in packetizing
+ * to sub-MSS pieces for the sake of SWS or making sure there
+ * are enough packets in the pipe for fast recovery.
+ *
+ * On the other hand, for extremely large MSS devices, handling
+ * smaller than MSS windows in this way does make sense.
+ */
+ if (tp->max_window >= 512)
+ cutoff = (tp->max_window >> 1);
+ else
+ cutoff = tp->max_window;
+
+ if (cutoff && pktsize > cutoff)
+ return max(cutoff, 68U - tp->tcp_header_len);
else
return pktsize;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists