[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100915.233851.85414928.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...tta.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, bphilips@...e.de,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, bruce.w.allan@...el.com,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bhutchings@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] net: enable GRO by default for vlan
devices
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:21:25 -0700
> I think it is more complex than that. GRO is tied to NAPI,
> and bridge/bond don't use NAPI directly. They use netif_rx() for receiving
> because layered drivers can't directly up call because of possible
> issues with stack depth.
>
> To get GRO working for netif_rx case,
> the logic in process_backlog would have to change.
> But this queue is processing packets from multiple devices so
> it is not clear if GRO could be used.
Bonding's un-layering on RX is done in the normal netif_receive_skb()
control flow.
And bridging only uses netif_rx for multicast replication.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists