[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <381611284708887@web110.yandex.ru>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:34:46 +0400
From: "\"Oleg A. Arkhangelsky\"" <sysoleg@...dex.ru>
To: Amit Salecha <amit.salecha@...gic.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH NEXT 3/5] qlcnic: vlan lro support
17.09.2010, 11:10, "Amit Salecha" <amit.salecha@...gic.com>:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 6:57 PM
>> To: Amit Salecha
>> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Ameen Rahman; Anirban
>> Chakraborty
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH NEXT 3/5] qlcnic: vlan lro support
>>
>> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2010 à 06:14 -0700, Amit Kumar Salecha a écrit :
>>> LRO + GRO + vlan rx accleration support, performance increases
>>> around 20% and cpu utilization reduces around 70% on vlan interface.
>> Interesting. What is the workload that demonstrates such gains ?
>
> Just to demonstrate decrease in cpu utilization further:
> I have taken numbers with various load. I used iperf application to run tcp traffic on vlan interface.
> There is around 80-90% of reduction in cpu utilization.
I'm wondering, how can this scale further. For example if I have 200K low speed simultaneous
TCP connections (router appliance case with many users). Can GRO give us some gain here?
--
wbr, Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists