[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF374A97D5.0C56095D-ON652577A1.00485CC0-652577A1.0049190A@in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:50:51 +0530
From: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
Cc: anthony@...emonkey.ws, arnd@...db.de, avi@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [v2 RFC PATCH 2/4] Changes for virtio-net
> Krishna Kumar2/India/IBM@...IN
> Sent by: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org
> > > +
> > > struct virtnet_info {
> > > struct virtio_device *vdev;
> > > - struct virtqueue *rvq, *svq, *cvq;
> > > + int numtxqs; /* Number of tx queues */
> > > + struct send_queue *sq;
> > > + struct virtqueue *rvq;
> > > + struct virtqueue *cvq;
> > > struct net_device *dev;
> >
> > struct napi will probably be dirtied by RX processing
> >
> > You should make sure it doesnt dirty cache line of above (read mostly)
> > fields
>
> I am changing the layout of napi wrt other pointers in
> this patch, though the to-be-submitted RX patch does that.
> Should I do something for this TX-only patch?
Sorry, I think my sentence is not clear! I will make this
change (and also cache-line align the send queues), test
and let you know the result.
Thanks,
- KK
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists