[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100917140219.GA9454@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:02:19 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
codalist@...a.cs.cmu.edu, autofs@...ux.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@...cvut.cz>,
Anders Larsen <al@...rsen.net>,
Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@...l.ru>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Samuel Ortiz <samuel@...tiz.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:50:49PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 17 September 2010, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:45:41PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > ncpfs: replace BKL with lock_super
> >
> > Err, no. lock_super is just as much on it's way out as the BKL. We've
> > managed to move it down from the VFS into a few remaining filesystems
> > and now need to get rid of those users. Please don't add any new ones.
>
> Ok. I guess that's also a NAK for my the isofs patch I posted yesterday
> then. Do you have any suggestions for an alternative approach?
Just add a per-sb mutex inside the filesystem. Given that lock_super
isn't used by the VFS anymore that's actually equivalent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists