[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C97D197.9070703@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:26:47 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
CC: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Jean Delvare \(PC drivers\, core\)" <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
"Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...lsio.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: idr_get_new_exact ?
Hello,
On 09/20/2010 10:35 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Looks fine to me as an improvement over the status quo, but I wonder how
> many of these places could use the radix_tree stuff instead? If you're
> not using the ability of the idr code to assign an id for you, then it
> seems the radix_tree API is a better fit.
I agree. Wouldn't those users better off simply using radix tree?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists