netdev - Re: [2.6.36-rc5] INET?: possible irq lock inversion dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1285064011.2617.238.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:13:31 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.36-rc5] INET?: possible irq lock inversion dependency

Le mardi 21 septembre 2010 à 11:36 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le mardi 21 septembre 2010 à 18:10 +0900, Tetsuo Handa a écrit :
> > Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > I would say someone calls xs_tcp_state_change() while softirqs are not
> > > masked.
> > > 
> > > If its expected, then following patch is needed ?
> > 
> > After applying your patch, I got the same warning on different place.
> > I got this when doing "mount 127.0.0.1:/usr/src/ /mnt/".
> 
> Hmm, but what are the changes in your tree ?
> 

(Because I dont have these lockdep splats here with 2.6.36-rc5)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html