netdev - Re: Regression, bisected: reference leak with IPSec since ~2.6.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100921104821.GA8986@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:48:21 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Regression, bisected: reference leak with IPSec since ~2.6.31

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:07:37PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 21 septembre 2010 ?? 11:55 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> > Le mardi 21 septembre 2010 ?? 09:38 +0000, Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
> > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:21:00AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > 
> > > I hope you're right with this.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I liked the :
> > > > 
> > > > <check everything without changing state>
> > > > if something wrong
> > > > 	goto slow_path
> > > > else
> > > > 	<OK, lets do destructive things>
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > But it's an optimization of the "unlikely" case btw. ;-)
> > > 
> > 
> > This is a bug fix, in a complex function.
> > 
> > in -next branch, we can try to be smart, adding more code in slow_path
> > to revert what was done in the hope fast path would be taken.
> > And pray we dont add another bug :)

But if you were honest about caches there is no reason to be smart
no more. ;-)

Below is your patch mostly as an example only that I didn't mean
nothing complex (ipv4 only, not compiled).

Jarek P.
---

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
index 04b6989..049d61f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -490,7 +490,6 @@ int ip_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*output)(struct sk_buff *))
 	if (skb_has_frags(skb)) {
 		struct sk_buff *frag;
 		int first_len = skb_pagelen(skb);
-		int truesizes = 0;
 
 		if (first_len - hlen > mtu ||
 		    ((first_len - hlen) & 7) ||
@@ -503,18 +502,18 @@ int ip_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*output)(struct sk_buff *))
 			if (frag->len > mtu ||
 			    ((frag->len & 7) && frag->next) ||
 			    skb_headroom(frag) < hlen)
-			    goto slow_path;
+			    goto slow_path_clean;
 
 			/* Partially cloned skb? */
 			if (skb_shared(frag))
-				goto slow_path;
+				goto slow_path_clean;
 
 			BUG_ON(frag->sk);
 			if (skb->sk) {
 				frag->sk = skb->sk;
 				frag->destructor = sock_wfree;
+				skb->truesize -= frag->truesize;
 			}
-			truesizes += frag->truesize;
 		}
 
 		/* Everything is OK. Generate! */
@@ -524,7 +523,6 @@ int ip_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*output)(struct sk_buff *))
 		frag = skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list;
 		skb_frag_list_init(skb);
 		skb->data_len = first_len - skb_headlen(skb);
-		skb->truesize -= truesizes;
 		skb->len = first_len;
 		iph->tot_len = htons(first_len);
 		iph->frag_off = htons(IP_MF);
@@ -576,6 +574,17 @@ int ip_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*output)(struct sk_buff *))
 		}
 		IP_INC_STATS(dev_net(dev), IPSTATS_MIB_FRAGFAILS);
 		return err;
+
+slow_path_clean:
+		if (skb->sk) {
+			skb_walk_frags(skb, frag) {
+				if (!frag->sk)
+					break;
+				frag->sk = NULL;
+				frag->destructor = NULL;
+				skb->truesize += frag->truesize;
+			}
+		}
 	}
 
 slow_path:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html