[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100922211808.GJ11157@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:18:08 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Bernard Metzler <BMT@...ich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] siw: Add support for CRC32C offload instruction
using libcrypto crc32c-intel
[cc list chopped]
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:00:41PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:59 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:38:21PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> >
> > > Indeed, this would clean up the explict RX/TX CRC32C case quite a
> > > bit.. Unfortuately I am too busy with other items atm to cook up
> > > this patch, but I would be happy to test it if someone wants to take
> > > it. ;)
> >
> > Do you even need to do anything at all? crc32c is provided by
> > crc32c-intel at a higher priority already, so it should be used if it
> > is available..
>
> I believe with the current libcrypto code that consumers are still
> required to explictly ask for crc32c-intel offload.
Really? It all looks OK to me.. What does your /proc/crypto say on a
system with crc32c-intel support?
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists