netdev - Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C99A65E.7080606@trash.net>
Date:	Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:46:54 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...ia.com>
CC:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
	"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Ylalehto Janne (Nokia-MS/Tampere)" <janne.ylalehto@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_condition

Am 21.09.2010 22:02, schrieb Luciano Coelho:
> On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 07:38 +0200, ext Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> On 15.09.2010 23:09, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 2010-09-15 22:59, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>>> On 15.09.2010 22:52, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday 2010-09-15 22:39, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>>>>> Am 17.08.2010 10:36, schrieb Luciano Coelho:
>>>>>>> +/* Defaults, these can be overridden on the module command-line. */
>>>>>>> +static unsigned int condition_list_perms = S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR;
>>>>>>> +static unsigned int condition_uid_perms = 0;
>>>>>>> +static unsigned int condition_gid_perms = 0;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure whether we already discussed this, but this isn't
>>>>>> useful if namespaces are used since the IDs aren't global.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well it's also done for other xt modules that offer a procfs interface.
>>>>> It does not really cost much to have this present I'd say.
>>>>
>>>> They should simply set the permissions for the current namespace.
>>>>
>>> IIRC, the namespace stuff was going to be a later patch to keep
>>> early patches simpler.
>>
>> I'm fine with that as long as its done before merging the patches
>> upstream.
> 
> I'll try to fix this and create a new patch on top of the existing ones,
> then I'll send them all as a single patchset.

Sounds good, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html