[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285144471.2639.96.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:34:31 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.36-rc5] INET?: possible irq lock inversion dependency
Le mercredi 22 septembre 2010 à 10:31 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index b05b9b6..afd0f69 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -1210,7 +1210,9 @@ struct sock *sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority)
> spin_lock_init(&newsk->sk_dst_lock);
> rwlock_init(&newsk->sk_callback_lock);
> lockdep_set_class_and_name(&newsk->sk_callback_lock,
> - af_callback_keys + newsk->sk_family,
> + sk->sk_prot->callback_key ?
> + sk->sk_prot->callback_key :
> + af_callback_keys + newsk->sk_family,
> af_family_clock_key_strings[newsk->sk_family]);
>
> newsk->sk_dst_cache = NULL;
> @@ -1965,6 +1967,9 @@ void sock_init_data(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk)
> spin_lock_init(&sk->sk_dst_lock);
> rwlock_init(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> lockdep_set_class_and_name(&sk->sk_callback_lock,
> + sk->sk_prot->callback_key ?
> + sk->sk_prot->callback_key :
> + af_callback_keys + newsk->sk_family,
small bug in my patch , please delete the orphan line :
> af_callback_keys + sk->sk_family,
> af_family_clock_key_strings[sk->sk_family]);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists