lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C9C5E0C.1000200@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:15:08 -0700
From:	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com" <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: allocate rx queues in register_netdevice
 only

On 9/23/2010 8:26 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
>> Also, I dont understand why we need to restrict
>> netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() to lower the count.
>> This wastes memory.
>>
>> Why dont we allocate dev->_rx once we know the real count, not in
>> alloc_netdev_mq() but in register_netdevice() ?
>>

Eric,

At least in the TX case we may not "know" until later how many tx_queues we want to use. For example it could change based on enabling/disabling features or available interrupts. So we use num_tx_queues as the max we ever expect to use and then netif_set_real_num_tx_queues() sets the number we want to use.

I presume for rx queues there are similar cases where features and available interrupts may determine how many rx queues are needed.

Moving the allocation later could help drivers make better max number of queue decisions. But, I think we still need the netif_set_num_rx_queues() and netif_set_num_tx_queues(). Although this does end up wasting memory as you pointed out.

Thanks,
John. 

>>
> 
> Here is a patch to make this possible
> 
> I guess a similar thing could be done for tx queues.
> 
> boot tested, but please double check.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: allocate rx queues in register_netdevice()
> 
> Instead of having two places were we allocate dev->_rx, introduce
> netif_alloc_rx_queues() helper and call it only from
> register_netdevice(), not from alloc_netdev_mq()
> 
> Goal is to let drivers change dev->num_rx_queues after allocating netdev
> and before registering it.
> 
> This also removes a lot of ifdefs in net/core/dev.c
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> ---
>  net/core/dev.c |   76 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 2c7934f..9110b8d 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -4964,6 +4964,34 @@ void netif_stacked_transfer_operstate(const struct net_device *rootdev,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_stacked_transfer_operstate);
>  
> +static int netif_alloc_rx_queues(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> +	unsigned int i, count = dev->num_rx_queues;
> +
> +	if (count) {
> +		struct netdev_rx_queue *rx;
> +
> +		rx = kcalloc(count, sizeof(struct netdev_rx_queue), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!rx) {
> +			pr_err("netdev: Unable to allocate %u rx queues.\n",
> +			       count);
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +		dev->_rx = rx;
> +		atomic_set(&rx->count, count);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Set a pointer to first element in the array which holds the
> +		 * reference count.
> +		 */
> +		for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> +			rx[i].first = rx;
> +	}
> +#endif
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   *	register_netdevice	- register a network device
>   *	@dev: device to register
> @@ -5001,24 +5029,10 @@ int register_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
>  
>  	dev->iflink = -1;
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> -	if (!dev->num_rx_queues) {
> -		/*
> -		 * Allocate a single RX queue if driver never called
> -		 * alloc_netdev_mq
> -		 */
> -
> -		dev->_rx = kzalloc(sizeof(struct netdev_rx_queue), GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!dev->_rx) {
> -			ret = -ENOMEM;
> -			goto out;
> -		}
> +	ret = netif_alloc_rx_queues(dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
>  
> -		dev->_rx->first = dev->_rx;
> -		atomic_set(&dev->_rx->count, 1);
> -		dev->num_rx_queues = 1;
> -	}
> -#endif
>  	/* Init, if this function is available */
>  	if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_init) {
>  		ret = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_init(dev);
> @@ -5414,10 +5428,6 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mq(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
>  	struct net_device *dev;
>  	size_t alloc_size;
>  	struct net_device *p;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> -	struct netdev_rx_queue *rx;
> -	int i;
> -#endif
>  
>  	BUG_ON(strlen(name) >= sizeof(dev->name));
>  
> @@ -5443,29 +5453,12 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mq(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
>  		goto free_p;
>  	}
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> -	rx = kcalloc(queue_count, sizeof(struct netdev_rx_queue), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rx) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "alloc_netdev: Unable to allocate "
> -		       "rx queues.\n");
> -		goto free_tx;
> -	}
> -
> -	atomic_set(&rx->count, queue_count);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Set a pointer to first element in the array which holds the
> -	 * reference count.
> -	 */
> -	for (i = 0; i < queue_count; i++)
> -		rx[i].first = rx;
> -#endif
>  
>  	dev = PTR_ALIGN(p, NETDEV_ALIGN);
>  	dev->padded = (char *)dev - (char *)p;
>  
>  	if (dev_addr_init(dev))
> -		goto free_rx;
> +		goto free_tx;
>  
>  	dev_mc_init(dev);
>  	dev_uc_init(dev);
> @@ -5477,7 +5470,6 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mq(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
>  	dev->real_num_tx_queues = queue_count;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> -	dev->_rx = rx;
>  	dev->num_rx_queues = queue_count;
>  #endif
>  
> @@ -5495,11 +5487,7 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mq(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
>  	strcpy(dev->name, name);
>  	return dev;
>  
> -free_rx:
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> -	kfree(rx);
>  free_tx:
> -#endif
>  	kfree(tx);
>  free_p:
>  	kfree(p);
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ