[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285292892.2380.16.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 03:48:12 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, sridharr@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xmit_compl_seq: information to reclaim vmsplice
buffers
Le jeudi 23 septembre 2010 à 14:35 -0700, Tom Herbert a écrit :
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index 3e8a4db..3d8d33f 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -1768,6 +1768,12 @@ skip_copy:
>
> TCP_CHECK_TIMER(sk);
> release_sock(sk);
> +
> + /* Copy the first unacked seq into the receive msg control part. */
> + if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_XMIT_COMPL_SEQ))
> + put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SCM_XMIT_COMPL_SEQ,
> + sizeof(tp->snd_una), &tp->snd_una);
> +
> return copied;
>
> out:
Tom,
I took the time to suggest : copy tp->snd_una before release_sock().
Why do you try to avoid this copy and introduce a bug ?
Hint : put_cmsg() (and copy_to_user()) makes no guarantee the copy is
atomic.
It can be implemented by a 4 bytes copy, faut during this copy or being
interrupted, and application might get a garbled value, if tcp stack
modifies tp->snd_una during the copy.
If you want to optimize this (because release_sock() can process the
socket backlog, and update snd_una), please use :
/* Copy the first unacked seq into the receive msg control part.
* As put_cmsg() might sleep, we must copy snd_una in a private var.
* Integer reads are atomic on all arches, so this copy can be
* performed while socket is unlocked.
*/
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_XMIT_COMPL_SEQ)) {
u32 snd_una = tp->snd_una;
put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SCM_XMIT_COMPL_SEQ,
sizeof(snd_una), &snd_una);
}
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists