[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285344352.2503.321.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:05:52 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Ulrich Weber <uweber@...aro.com>
Cc: Ulrich Weber <ulrich.weber@...glemail.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dont create cached routes from ARP requests
Le vendredi 24 septembre 2010 à 17:38 +0200, Ulrich Weber a écrit :
> Yes, as I wrote before my Cable ISP is flooding me with
> ARP requests from 10.0.0.0/8, which get a route
> via the primary PPP link.
>
> I know thats not a common setup but why do that
> kind of routes have to be cached ? :)
>
>
> steps to reproduce:
> server:
> ip route add 1.0.0.0/8 dev dummy0
>
> client:
> ip route add 1.0.0.0/8 dev eth0
> nmap --min-rate 500 -sP 1.0.0.0/8
>
Great, you use nmap and fill 'client' neighbour cache.
Now, back to the _real_ problem, please ?
<quote>
Background: At home I have two Internet connections, DSL and Cable.
DSL is the primary uplink while Cable is the secondary.
My Cable ISP is flooding me with ARP request from 10.0.0.0/8,
which creates routes via the primary uplink.
There are thousands of cached routes and after some time
I get "Neighbour table overflow" messages.
</quote>
You receive an ARP request on device eth1,
this creates a route on eth0 ?
Could you send your routing/address setup ?
ip addr
ip ro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists