netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/5] AF_UNIX: find peers on multicast Unix stream sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1285351237.2478.7.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:00:37 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...labora.co.uk>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Ian Molton <ian.molton@...labora.co.uk>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dbus@...edesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] AF_UNIX: find peers on multicast Unix stream
 sockets

Le vendredi 24 septembre 2010 à 18:25 +0100, Alban Crequy a écrit :

> @@ -1612,7 +1671,12 @@ static int unix_stream_sendmsg(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct socket *sock,
>  	} else {
>  		sunaddr = NULL;
>  		err = -ENOTCONN;
> -		other = NULL; /* FIXME: get the list of other connection */
> +		max_others = atomic_read(&unix_nr_multicast_socks);
> +		others = kzalloc((max_others + 1) * sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		unix_find_other(sock_net(sk), u->addr->name,
> +		    u->addr->len, 0, u->addr->hash, 1, others, max_others, &err);
> +		other = others[0];
> +		kfree(others);
>  		if (!other)
>  			goto out_err;
>  	}

Seriously, this block sizing against unix_nr_multicast_socks is not
scalable. What happens if we have 1000 sockets ?
kzalloc() to clear 8000 bytes ?
Its also unsafe.

(say you kzalloc() a buffer for 2 sockets, and another cpu inserts a new
socket. unix_find_socket_byname() can overflow the buffer)


You should use a list, and allocates elements in
unix_find_socket_byname()

struct item {
	struct item *next;
	struct sock *s;
};


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html