lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20100924.211824.242130957.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:18:24 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: padovan@...fusion.mobi Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marcel@...tmann.org, mathewm@...eaurora.org Subject: Re: Deadlock in Bluetooth code in 2.6.36 From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@...fusion.mobi> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:20:12 -0300 > My questions here is on how to fix this properly. Maybe > sock_alloc_send_skb() should not be used with SOCK_STREAM and reliable > protocols and I'm not aware of that? And should I use something like > sk_stream_alloc_skb() instead? > > Any comments are welcome. With lucky we can fix that for 2.6.36 and > together with others fixes we have queued deliver a fully functional > L2CAP layer on 2.6.36. Use sock_alloc_send_skb() as you do now, but if it fails wait for socket space to become available just like TCP does, then loop back and try to allocate again if the space-wait doesn't return an error. I think you should be able to reuse sk_stream_wait_memory() for this purpose just fine and without any problems. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists