[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1285617608.9983.30.camel@nexus>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:00:08 +0200
From: Damian Lukowski <damian@....rwth-aachen.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: yuri@...nteg.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 18952] New: The mount of SYN retries is not equal
to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syn_retries
Ok, I see.
When I read your mail this morning, I was afraid, that this is another
bug in the calculation routine. However, the routine seems ok to me.
The problem is the high discrepancy between the RTO_MIN-based
calculation and TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT-based actual backoff in the SYN-case.
Yuris example did not reveal a conceptually new bug, as the same
behaviour can be observed on pre 2.6.32 kernels at higher values.
I tested wget on a 2.6.26 kernel with timeout values of 300 and above.
All runs did time out after 189 seconds, with the sysctl-value as their
hard limit.
My suggestion for solving this issue:
Introducing a third boolean parameter for retransmits_timed_out()
indicating whether the socket is in SYN state or not. In the SYN case,
TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT will be used for the calculation instead of
TCP_RTO_MIN.
Is that ok?
Regards
Damian
Am Montag, den 27.09.2010, 01:10 -0700 schrieb David Miller:
> From: Yuri Chislov <yuri@...nteg.net>
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:07:06 +0200
>
> > It looks like the behavior changed in 2.6.32. 2.6.32 and up, uses some
> > calculation instead of a direct definition of the retries number, that makes it
> > harder to achieve the necessary system behavior.
> >
> > The default behavior of the system changed completely
> > (the old default connect timeout was ~ 180 seconds, while the new one is ~21
> > sec).
> >
> > The new behavior invalidates the kernel documentation and tcp man page.
> >
> > It's not possible to set a connect timeout > 25 sec in the applications while
> > using the default values in /proc.
> >
> > From my view point is regression.
>
> Agreed, Damian you have to fix this.
>
> Otherwise I'm reverting all of your Revert Backoff commits.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists