netdev - Re: [RFC] Online firmware upgrade in non-embedded systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1285763658.2437.112.camel@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:34:18 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	sf-linux-drivers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Online firmware upgrade in non-embedded systems

On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 18:59 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Currently the sfc network driver is optionally combined with an MTD
> driver (CONFIG_SFC_MTD) which exposes all upgradable firmware and
> configuration partitions in flash.  This works nicely in kernels with
> MTD enabled, but since MTD is mainly used in embedded systems with
> on-board flash it is often disabled in distribution kernels and custom
> kernels alike.  This leaves users of sfc unable to upgrade firmware
> without rebuilding the kernel or booting some other distribution.  The
> lack of widespread MTD support is a regular cause of support requests.

At least Fedora does have MTD enabled. But I guess commercial
distributions like RHEL might have it disabled (but I did not check),
and I think I could guess the reason for this.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html