[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100930114958.59c438d7@s6510>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:49:58 +0900
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: "Vasanthy Kolluri (vkolluri)" <vkolluri@...co.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Scott Feldman (scofeldm)" <scofeldm@...co.com>,
"Roopa Prabhu (roprabhu)" <roprabhu@...co.com>,
"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] enic: remove dead code
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:10:00 -0700
"Vasanthy Kolluri (vkolluri)" <vkolluri@...co.com> wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot for submitting this patch. However, I have got few
> concerns:
>
>
>
> 1. Need to retain vnic_dev_soft_reset and vnic_dev_soft_reset_done
> as they are used in vnic_dev_hang_reset and vnic_dev_hang_reset_done
> respectively
>
> 2. Want to retain enic_set_rss_key and enic_set_rss_cpu as we will
> be using those in the near future for adding multi rq functionality to
> enic.
>
> 3. Additional cleanup in vnic_rss.h. FYI, the struct defines in
> vnic_rss.h are currently not in use. But I retained them for the same
> reason as in #2.
Ok, but Linux tree is not the repository for "possible future enhancements".
Do it or remove it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists