netdev - Re: [RFC 1/2] genetlink: introduce pre_doit/post

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:47:01 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	tgraf@...g.ch
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] genetlink: introduce pre_doit/post_doit hooks

On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 00:44 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 08:41 +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
> 
> > >  d) include two private pointers in each info
> > >    struct passed between all these operations
> > >    including doit(). (It's two because I'll
> > >    need two in nl80211 -- can be extended.)
> > 
> > Stupid question:
> > 
> > Why not have a priv struct rather than an arbitrary array of two pointers?
> 
> It'd have to be dynamically allocated, and the "arbitrary" array of two
> pointers can be on the stack.

Maybe I should elaborate -- a priv struct basically means just a single
pointer, and then I'd have to allocate something to hold two pointers in
nl80211 and assign it to that single pointer.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html