lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinRm7dB=n7KG8+TU0_=gf-19LUPV+40_m2YxbU2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:07:48 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: code cleanups

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 10:24 +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
>> Compare operations are more readable, and compilers generate the same code
>> for the both.
>
> As far as I know, not all supported versions of gcc
> generate the same code.

Is the former better for the compilers?

>
> Also, you could probably now remove the (__force u32) casts.
>

Maybe Eric doesn't think so.

-- 
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ