netdev - [PATCHv4 net-next-2.6 0/5] Removal of RH2/HAO from IPsec-protected MIPv6 traffic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 04 Oct 2010 08:24:51 +0200
From:	Arnaud Ebalard <arno@...isbad.org>
To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHv4 net-next-2.6 0/5] Removal of RH2/HAO from IPsec-protected MIPv6 traffic

Hi,

This is version 4 of the patches. Compared to previous version:

 - symbols which need not be exported are no more exported
 - s/printk(KERNINFO, ...)/pr_info()/ in net/ipv6/mip6.c (my code
   and existing one)
 - I also refactored some initialization code for mip6 states
   (by introduced mip6_state_init_sanity_check())

After the discussion with Herbert, I decided to leave input handlers
as they are at the moment until I have some additional time to dig on
it. At least, it's safe.

Regarding reject handler() (to warn user space so that a Binding Error
can be sent), it still does nothing yet.

Herbert, if you read this, can you take a quick look at patches 1/5 and
4/5 to tell if the changes are acceptable for IPsec users.

Cheers,

a+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html