[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinVtz0VuLkOY5d8QjdvLMXOFD2EaWp_kSBbMJBW@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 13:16:40 +0200
From: Nicola Padovano <nicola.padovano@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: checkentry function
>
> Because xxx_check() signature is not the one you use.
>
> Could you read source code of _current_ existing modules , and use
> copy/paste ?
>
> static int hashlimit_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
> {
> ...
> }
as i've written in a previously mail this is the checkentry function
that i use in my source code to check if the iptables command line is
a right line.
[CHECK_ENTRY_CODE]
static bool xt_tarpit_check(const char *tablename, const void *entry,
const struct xt_target *target, void *targinfo,
unsigned int hook_mask)
{
if (strcmp(tablename, "filter")) {
printk(KERN_INFO "DEBUG: the tablename (not FILTER) is %s\n",tablename);
return false;
}
return true;
}
[/CHECK_ENTRY_CODE]
but it doesn't work...NOTE: the module goes inside the function but
the tablename value is a wrong one (also if I set "-t filter" option
in the iptables command line)
i don't know what "static int hashlimit_mt_check(const struct
xt_mtchk_param *par)" is...
thank you
--
Nicola Padovano
e-mail: nicola.padovano@...il.com
web: http://npadovano.altervista.org
"My only ambition is not be anything at all; it seems the most
sensible thing" (C. Bukowski)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists