netdev - Re: ixgbe: normalize frag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Cc:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
	bruce.w.allan@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ixgbe: normalize frag_list usage

From: "Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:45:32 -0700

> The patch below is kind of what I had in mind for a way to do RSC and maintain
> the pointer scheme you are looking for.  Consider this patch an RFC for now
> since I based this off of Jeff's internal testing tree and so it would need
> some modification to apply cleanly to net-next.

Can you really not remember the head somewhere?

What I wanted is for everyone to build their frag list SKBs from head to tail,
always.  So that I could, as I mentioned in my original posting, do something
like:

struct sk_buff {
	union {
		struct list_head list;
		struct {
			struct sk_buff	*frag_next;
			struct sk_buff	*frag_tail_tracker;
		};
	};
};

The ->frag_tail_tracker is only used in the head SKB to maintain where the
last SKB in the frag list is.

You're tracking the head from the inner SKBs, such that my intended
conventions are not being followed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html