[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101007164906.GB122295@jupiter.n2.diac24.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:49:06 +0200
From: David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>
To: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Narendra_K@...l.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Jordan_Hargrave@...l.com,
Vijay_Nijhawan@...l.com, Charles_Rose@...l.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Use firmware provided index to register a network
interface
Hi Matt,
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:31:13AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> At most, they'll have to deal with the same "eth0_rename"
Getting that "eth0_rename" stuff is not something unchangeably imposed
by the kernel. I think this should be considered an udev bug most of all
things, since if the udev scripts did it right, this wouldn't happen. A
"right" way to do this would for example be to first rename all devices
to "tmpwhatever0", then rename them back to their proper ethX names.
Now I don't know even a single bit about udev scripting, so maybe this
isn't possible with the current udev infrastructure, but there's
certainly no kernel part stopping a proper implementation.
Btw, what happened to nameif(8)? It's totally outdated (and deprecated I
guess?), but it got the job done...
-David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists