[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101008.111406.246542521.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mjg59@...f.ucam.org
Cc: ellyjones@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jglasgow@...gle.com,
msb@...gle.com, olofj@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add Qualcomm Gobi 2000 driver.
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:03:10 +0100
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 10:28:03AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
>> I've looked at the gobi_loader code and it's simpler than many
>> of the gigabit ethernet driver firmware loader sequences in
>> the tree already.
>>
>> Requiring udev et al. magic only makes this networking device
>> that much harder to use from an initrd.
>>
>> I understand how this might be a bit clumsy since we'd need to make a
>> dependency on the serial device since that is the mechanism by which
>> the firmware is uploaded, but really I'd like you to consider it
>> seriously.
>
> The device is capable of functioning in either UMTS or CDMA modes, and
> requires different firmware for each. Further, there's separate firmware
> images per carrier due to regulatory differences. To make things even
> more complicated, there's no consistency in the naming of the firmware
> (and we can't fix that, because the firmware is undistributable). The
> only way to do this in-kernel would seem to be to have a module
> parameter to pass a firmware name, which really doesn't seem elegant.
I don't think we want a driver in the tree for a device for which the
firmware isn't even distributable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists