[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CB2C33C.8080109@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:56:44 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: ML netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, chas@....nrl.navy.mil
Subject: [HELP] ATM: mpc, use-after-free
Hi,
Stanse found this use-after-free:
static void mpc_push(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
...
new_skb = skb_realloc_headroom(skb, eg->ctrl_info.DH_length);
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
FREE ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
if (new_skb == NULL) {
mpc->eg_ops->put(eg);
return;
}
skb_push(new_skb, eg->ctrl_info.DH_length);
skb_copy_to_linear_data(new_skb, eg->ctrl_info.DLL_header,
eg->ctrl_info.DH_length);
...
memset(ATM_SKB(skb), 0, sizeof(struct atm_skb_data));
USE ^^^^^^^^^^^^
netif_rx(new_skb);
I guess it should be ATM_SKB(new_skb), right?
The two problems are:
1) obvious use-after-free
2) ?data leak, since we don't erase the right memory?
thanks,
--
js
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists