netdev - Re: [PATCH] atl1c: Add support for Atheros AR8152 and AR8152

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1286759930.2955.285.camel@localhost>
Date:	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 02:18:50 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atl1c: Add support for Atheros AR8152 and AR8152

Your commit 496c185c9495629ef1c65387cb2594578393cfe0 "atl1c: Add support
for Atheros AR8152 and AR8152" included the following changes:

> --- a/drivers/net/atl1c/atl1c_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/atl1c/atl1c_hw.c
> @@ -70,17 +70,39 @@ static int atl1c_get_permanent_address(struct atl1c_hw *hw)
[...]
> -		/* Enable OTP CLK */
> -		if (!(otp_ctrl_data & OTP_CTRL_CLK_EN)) {
> -			otp_ctrl_data |= OTP_CTRL_CLK_EN;
> -			AT_WRITE_REG(hw, REG_OTP_CTRL, otp_ctrl_data);
> -			AT_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
> -			msleep(1);
> +		if (hw->nic_type == athr_l1c || hw->nic_type == athr_l2c_b) {
> +			/* Enable OTP CLK */
> +			if (!(otp_ctrl_data & OTP_CTRL_CLK_EN)) {
> +				otp_ctrl_data |= OTP_CTRL_CLK_EN;
> +				AT_WRITE_REG(hw, REG_OTP_CTRL, otp_ctrl_data);
> +				AT_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
> +				msleep(1);
> +			}
> +		}
[...]
> @@ -96,11 +118,31 @@ static int atl1c_get_permanent_address(struct atl1c_hw *hw)
>  			return -1;
>  	}
>  	/* Disable OTP_CLK */
> -	if (otp_ctrl_data & OTP_CTRL_CLK_EN) {
> -		otp_ctrl_data &= ~OTP_CTRL_CLK_EN;
> -		AT_WRITE_REG(hw, REG_OTP_CTRL, otp_ctrl_data);
> -		AT_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
> -		msleep(1);
> +	if ((hw->nic_type == athr_l1c || hw->nic_type == athr_l2c)) {
> +		if (otp_ctrl_data & OTP_CTRL_CLK_EN) {
> +			otp_ctrl_data &= ~OTP_CTRL_CLK_EN;
> +			AT_WRITE_REG(hw, REG_OTP_CTRL, otp_ctrl_data);
> +			AT_WRITE_FLUSH(hw);
> +			msleep(1);
> +		}
> +	}

Shouldn't the first if-statement use the same condition as the second
i.e. matching the previously-defined hardware types athr_l1c and
athr_l2c?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)