netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CB3F89A.2010005@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:56:42 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the  tree

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:17:16 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c between commit
>> 66fa12c571d35e3cd62574c65f1785a460105397 ("ieee1394: remove the old IEEE
>> 1394 driver stack") from the  tree and commit
>                                ^
> I meant to say "the ieee1394 tree".

(I should have put the ieee1394 removal into -next much earlier.  OTOH the
conflicting commit is from August 17 already...)

Would it be useful if I rebase this small ieee1394 removal branch of mine onto
net?
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- =-=- -==--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html