[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101012005856.994bea6d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:58:56 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: allocate skbs on local node
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:49:53 +0200 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Le mardi 12 octobre 2010 à 00:24 -0700, Andrew Morton a écrit :
>
> > I'd love to forget it, but it's faster for some things (I forget
> > which). Which is why it's still around.
>
> Yes, two years ago it was true on pathological/obscure cases.
> Every time I did the comparison, SLUB won.
> You asked me, I did yet another test this morning, and 40% is pretty
> serious, I believe.
>
> >
> > And the ghastly thing about this is that you're forced to care about it
> > too because some people are, apparently, still using it.
> >
>
> Yes, some people (in my company) still use linux 2.6.9 32bit on HP G6/G7
> machines, I know...
>
> I am not saying we should not care, but for any serious network workload
> on NUMA arches, SLUB is the best, and seeing Christoph recent work, it
> might even get better.
>
> BTW, I believe all modern distros ship SLUB, dont they ?
>
Dunno.
Pekka, why haven't we deleted slab yet??
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists