netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: dont use netdev_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTi=NvnPov_=KQJz2uXt1R-ep4oahDF0J=3HwhGzG@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:03:43 -0700
From:	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
	Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: dont use netdev_alloc_skb()

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Le mardi 12 octobre 2010 à 01:03 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>> netdev_alloc_skb() is a very wrong interface, really.
>>
>> We should remove/deprecate it.
>>
>> For multi queue devices, it makes more sense to allocate skb on local
>> node of the cpu handling RX interrupts. This allow each cpu to
>> manipulate its own slub/slab queues/structures without doing expensive
>> cross-node business.
>>
>> For non multi queue devices, IRQ affinity should be set so that a cpu
>> close to the device services interrupts. Even if not set, using
>> dev_alloc_skb() is faster.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>
> Or maybe revert :
>
> commit b30973f877fea1a3fb84e05599890fcc082a88e5
> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Date:   Wed Dec 6 20:32:36 2006 -0800
>

I second this revert.  Node aware allocation by device's node makes
little sense on a multi-queue device and leads to mediocre
performance.

>    [PATCH] node-aware skb allocation
>
>    Node-aware allocation of skbs for the receive path.
>
>    Details:
>
>      - __alloc_skb gets a new node argument and cals the node-aware
>        slab functions with it.
>      - netdev_alloc_skb passed the node number it gets from dev_to_node
>        to it, everyone else passes -1 (any node)
>
>    Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>    Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@...r.sgi.com>
>    Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
>    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
>
>
> Apparently, only Christoph and Andrew signed it.
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html