netdev - Re: tbf/htb qdisc limitations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101013062649.GA6915@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 06:26:49 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc:	Steven Brudenell <steven.brudenell@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tbf/htb qdisc limitations

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 03:17:18PM -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
>>> my burst problem is the only semi-legitimate motivation i can think
>>> of. the only other possible motivations i can imagine are setting
>>> "limit" to buffer more than 4GB of packets and setting "rate" to
>>> something more than 32 gigabit; both of these seem kind of dubious. is
>>> there something else you had in mind?
>>
>>
>> No, mainly 10 gigabit rates and additionally 64-bit stats.
>
> Any issue for bonded 10 GbE interfaces?  Now that the IEEE have ratified 
> (June) how far out are 40 GbE interfaces?  Or 100 GbE for that matter.

Alas packet schedulers using rate tables are still around 1G. Above 2G
they get less and less accurate, so hfsc is recommended.

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html