[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinAj=9-RqNA6xKc_5ONz2hPMRGM8uJ2Xy7XJVdr@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 02:14:01 +0300
From: emin ak <eminak71@...il.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 19692] New: linux-2.6.36-rc5 crash with gianfar
ethernet at full line rate traffic
> Hi Emin,
> Are there any problems with this testing?
>
> Jarek P.
>
Hi Jarek.
Sorry for delayed answer. As I promised, I have started the tests on
Monday (in spite of dealing with The Monday Syndrome:) I had applied
your patch and after two billions packet (and approximatly four hours)
passed kernel crashed with skb_over_panic error similar with first
type. To ensure the patch is failed or not, I rerun the same test
again. That time, surprisingly, it did'nt crashed again for two days
with same kernel. But this situation had occured before, I think
sometimes because of randomness of the applied ethernet traffic and
mostly because I cant apply all full line rate random traffic to my
target device because of wrong test setup (switch / hardware packet
generator settings etc..), it takes three or more day to crash the
kernel and sometimes it never crashes. My device only and only crashes
when I can apply full line rate random traffic. Before informing you
and the list with (official) test results, I want to be sure with the
truth of them. So that please let me apply more test to the target
device for a fews day more. After that I wish I'll came with good
news!
Thanks for your time and care alot.
Emin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists