[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101015081826.GA7205@ff.dom.local>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:18:26 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>
Cc: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
Steven Brudenell <steven.brudenell@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tbf/htb qdisc limitations
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 02:37:49AM -0400, Bill Fink wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 08:09:39AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 03:13:54AM -0400, Bill Fink wrote:
> > > > TSO/GSO was disabled and was using 9000-byte jumbo frames
> > > > (and specified mtu 9000 to tc command).
> > > >
> > > > Here was one attempt I made using tbf:
> > > >
> > > > tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1: prio
> > > > tc qdisc add dev eth2 parent 1:1 handle 10: tbf rate 8900mbit buffer 1112500 limit 10000 mtu 9000
> > > > tc filter add dev eth2 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32 match ip dst 192.168.1.23 flowid 10:1
> > > >
> > > > I tried many variations of the above, all without success.
> > >
> > > The main problem are smaller packets. If you had (almost) only 9000b
> > > frames this probably could work. [...]
> >
> > On the other hand, e.g. the limit above seems too low wrt mtu & rate.
>
> Actually, I discovered my commands above work just fine on
> a 2.6.35 box:
>
> i7test7% nuttcp -T10 -i1 192.168.1.17
> 1045.3125 MB / 1.00 sec = 8768.3573 Mbps 0 retrans
> 1045.6875 MB / 1.00 sec = 8772.0292 Mbps 0 retrans
> 1049.5625 MB / 1.00 sec = 8804.2627 Mbps 0 retrans
> 1043.1875 MB / 1.00 sec = 8750.9960 Mbps 0 retrans
> 1048.6875 MB / 1.00 sec = 8796.3246 Mbps 0 retrans
> 1033.4375 MB / 1.00 sec = 8669.3188 Mbps 0 retrans
> 1040.7500 MB / 1.00 sec = 8730.7057 Mbps 0 retrans
> 1047.0000 MB / 1.00 sec = 8783.2063 Mbps 0 retrans
> 1040.0000 MB / 1.00 sec = 8724.0564 Mbps 0 retrans
> 1037.4375 MB / 1.00 sec = 8702.5434 Mbps 0 retrans
>
> 10431.5608 MB / 10.00 sec = 8749.7542 Mbps 25 %TX 35 %RX 0 retrans 0.11 msRTT
>
> The problems I encountered were on a field system running
> 2.6.30.10. I will investigate upgrading the field system
> to 2.6.35.
This change from 2.6.31 should matter here:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.35.y.git;a=commit;h=a4a710c4a7490587406462bf1d54504b7783d7d7
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists