netdev - [PATCH 50/72] ipvs: move ip_route_me

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:19:37 +0200
From:	kaber@...sh.net
To:	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 50/72] ipvs: move ip_route_me_harder for ICMP

From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>

 	Currently, ip_route_me_harder after ip_vs_out_icmp
is called even if packet is not related to IPVS connection.
Move it into handle_response_icmp. Also, force rerouting
if sending to local client because IPv4 stack uses addresses
from the route.

Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
---
 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
index f7f5283..c4f091d 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
@@ -702,6 +702,17 @@ static int handle_response_icmp(int af, struct sk_buff *skb,
 #endif
 		ip_vs_nat_icmp(skb, pp, cp, 1);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
+	if (af == AF_INET6) {
+		if (sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute && ip6_route_me_harder(skb) != 0)
+			goto out;
+	} else
+#endif
+		if ((sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute ||
+		     skb_rtable(skb)->rt_flags & RTCF_LOCAL) &&
+		    ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL) != 0)
+			goto out;
+
 	/* do the statistics and put it back */
 	ip_vs_out_stats(cp, skb);
 
@@ -940,16 +951,16 @@ handle_response(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
 	 * if it came from this machine itself.  So re-compute
 	 * the routing information.
 	 */
-	if (sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
-		if (af == AF_INET6) {
-			if (ip6_route_me_harder(skb) != 0)
-				goto drop;
-		} else
+	if (af == AF_INET6) {
+		if (sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute && ip6_route_me_harder(skb) != 0)
+			goto drop;
+	} else
 #endif
-			if (ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL) != 0)
-				goto drop;
-	}
+		if ((sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute ||
+		     skb_rtable(skb)->rt_flags & RTCF_LOCAL) &&
+		    ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL) != 0)
+			goto drop;
 
 	IP_VS_DBG_PKT(10, pp, skb, 0, "After SNAT");
 
@@ -1001,13 +1012,8 @@ ip_vs_out(unsigned int hooknum, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			int verdict = ip_vs_out_icmp_v6(skb, &related,
 							hooknum);
 
-			if (related) {
-				if (sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute &&
-					NF_ACCEPT == verdict &&
-					ip6_route_me_harder(skb))
-					verdict = NF_DROP;
+			if (related)
 				return verdict;
-			}
 			ip_vs_fill_iphdr(af, skb_network_header(skb), &iph);
 		}
 	} else
@@ -1016,13 +1022,8 @@ ip_vs_out(unsigned int hooknum, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			int related;
 			int verdict = ip_vs_out_icmp(skb, &related, hooknum);
 
-			if (related) {
-				if (sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute &&
-					NF_ACCEPT == verdict &&
-					ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL))
-					verdict = NF_DROP;
+			if (related)
 				return verdict;
-			}
 			ip_vs_fill_iphdr(af, skb_network_header(skb), &iph);
 		}
 
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html