lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:15:32 +0200
From:	Michael Leun <lkml20100708@...ton.leun.net>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: NET_NS: unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free
 (adding ipv6 address to interface)

Hi,

unfortunately the bug described below originally reported in 2.6.35-rcX
is still there in 2.6.36.

Is there anything I might do to help fix it (besides fixing it myself,
I do not have the knowhow)?

On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:47:07 +0200
Michael Leun <lkml20100708@...ton.leun.net> wrote:

[...]
> Putting an ipv6 address on a device seems to be the trigger:
> 
> OrigNS > # ip link add type veth
> OrigNS > # ip link set dev veth0 up
> OrigNS > # unshare -n /bin/bash
> NewNS > # echo $$
> <SomePID>
> OrigNS > # ip link set dev veth1 netns <SomePID> # this, of course is
> on a different terminal NewNS > # ip link set dev veth1 up
> NewNS > # ip -6 addr add dev veth1 fd50:dead:beef::1/64
> NewNS > # exit
> 
> Yields
> 
> kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for veth1 to become free. Usage
> count = 3
> 
> Oh - its veth1 this time, not lo - add an "ip link set up dev lo" in
> the above scenario just after the unshare, and you get the message
> with lo.
> 
> One might ask, if
> 
> > # unshare -n /bin/bash
> > # ip link set up dev lo
> > # ip -6 addr add dev veth1 fd50:dead:beef::1/64
> > # exit
> 
> also does the trick, so I tried it - and it does NOT.
> 
> In the above scenario, not setting veth0 and veth1 up also makes it
> not happen. Only setting veth1 up also is not enough (seems to need
> to be "really up" what as you shurely know with veth is only the case
> when both sides are up).
> 
> I hope, this makes it somewhat easier to track that down.


-- 
MfG,

Michael Leun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ