netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/9] tproxy: added tproxy sockopt interface in the IPV6 layer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1010211037520.22922@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date:	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:39:02 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@...abit.hu>
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] tproxy: added tproxy sockopt interface in the IPV6
 layer

On Wednesday 2010-10-20 13:21, KOVACS Krisztian wrote:

>@@ -268,6 +268,10 @@ struct in6_flowlabel_req {
> /* RFC5082: Generalized Ttl Security Mechanism */
> #define IPV6_MINHOPCOUNT		73
> 
>+#define IPV6_ORIGDSTADDR        74
>+#define IPV6_RECVORIGDSTADDR    IPV6_ORIGDSTADDR
>+#define IPV6_TRANSPARENT        75
>+

Why do we actually need two names for the same thing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html