[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287758306.2316.35.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:38:26 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Yi Zou <yi.zou@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: NETIF_F_HW_CSUM does not imply FCoE CRC
offload
NETIF_F_HW_CSUM indicates the ability to update an TCP/IP-style 16-bit
checksum with the checksum of an arbitrary part of the packet data,
whereas the FCoE CRC is something entirely different.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: stable@...nel.org [2.6.32+]
---
net/core/dev.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index a698252..8ab61de 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1683,10 +1683,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_device_attach);
static bool can_checksum_protocol(unsigned long features, __be16 protocol)
{
- return ((features & NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM) ||
- ((features & NETIF_F_IP_CSUM) &&
+ return ((features & NETIF_F_NO_CSUM) ||
+ ((features & NETIF_F_V4_CSUM) &&
protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) ||
- ((features & NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM) &&
+ ((features & NETIF_F_V6_CSUM) &&
protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) ||
((features & NETIF_F_FCOE_CRC) &&
protocol == htons(ETH_P_FCOE)));
--
1.7.2.1
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists