netdev - Re: tap0 device stopped working in 2.6.36 (ok in 2.6.35)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CC40398.6070105@xs4all.nl>
Date:	Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:59:52 +0200
From:	Jim <jim876@...all.nl>
To:	Nolan Leake <nolan@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tap0 device stopped working in 2.6.36 (ok in 2.6.35)


Nolan,

Thanks for explaining the purpose of the patch.
But it appears something is missing and I think it breaks current
userspace. I use this tap0 device together with VirtualBox, I have a
virtual machine setup as bridged to tap0, not a very odd or strange
setup (this used to be the only method).
On the host side I run dhcpd to hand out IP address to the virtual
machine, but despite the dhcpd running on the tap0 device it never got
'ready' in the sense that no IP packets made it out from the host to the
guest.

On 10/23/2010 09:39 PM, Nolan Leake wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 14:55 +0200, Jim wrote:
>> After some checking noticed that apparently link isn't ready:
>>  modprobe tun
>>  tunctl -b
>>  ifconfig tap0 192.168.20.1 up
>> Gives:
>> [   26.411932] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): tap0: link is not ready
>>
>> Bisected it all the way to this commit:
>>
>> =================
>>
>> # git bisect good
>> bee31369ce16fc3898ec9a54161248c9eddb06bc is the first bad commit
>> commit bee31369ce16fc3898ec9a54161248c9eddb06bc
>> Author: Nolan Leake <nolan@...ulusnetworks.com>
>> Date:   Tue Jul 27 13:53:43 2010 +0000
>>
>>     tun: keep link (carrier) state up to date
>>
>>     Currently, only ethtool can get accurate link state of a tap device.
>>     With this patch, IFF_RUNNING and IF_OPER_UP/DOWN are kept up to date as
>>     well.
>>
>>     Signed-off-by: Nolan Leake <nolan@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> 
> Hello Jim,
> 
> Thank you for the report and the bisect.  Please allow me to explain the
> intention of this patch.
> 
> Previous to this patch, tun.c only kept the ethtool link state up to
> date.  IFF_ and IF_OPER_ state were always RUNNING and UP, respectively.
> 
> Ethtool link state was (and is) controlled by mapping "tun device FD
> open" to link up, and "tun device FD closed" to link down.  Obviously if
> you've just used tunctl to create a tap device, and no process has yet
> opened the /dev/net/tun backing FD, then this method establishes the
> link as down.  Ethtool on a kernel that predates this patch will confirm
> this.
> 
> What this patch does is make the IFF_RUNNING/IFF_OPER_UP state also
> match this interpretation of link state.  Making RUNNING and OPER_UP
> consistent with ethtool's concept of link state is, I believe,
> consistent with how other ethernet devices work.  The presence of a
> process that is sending and receiving packets via the tap device is a
> decent analog of link-state for a physical ethernet device.
> 
> Could your use-case be solved by a udev rule that assigns the IP address
> when the link state changes to UP/RUNNING?
> 
> If this is a common way to use tap devices, one possible solution is to
> make newly created but unattached tap devices default to UP/RUNNING (and
> presumably ethtool link-up, for consistency), and then only begin
> accurately reporting link state for subsequent open/closes of
> the /dev/net/tun device.
> 
> - nolan
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html