[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101026.101038.260090183.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: brian.haley@...com
Cc: lorenzo@...gle.com, shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: addrconf: clear IPv6 addresses and routes when
losing link
From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:58:54 -0400
> Having these addresses restart DAD is probably about as much as we
> can do I think, unless we add a per-device sysctl to remove the addresses
> (which I think has been shot-down before).
It would be fundamentally flawed, in my opinion, if the normal
mechanisms of ipv6 cannot handle this situation adequately.
That's really why I don't even want to consider the "blow away
the addresses" sysctl option.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists