netdev - RE: __bad_udelay in network driver breaks build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <80769D7B14936844A23C0C43D9FBCF0F25BCE9E78C@orsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:34:40 -0700
From:	"Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	"Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
Subject: RE: __bad_udelay in network driver breaks build

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andi Kleen [mailto:andi@...stfloor.org]
>Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:11 PM
>To: David Miller
>Cc: andi@...stfloor.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Kirsher, Jeffrey T;
>Duyck, Alexander H
>Subject: Re: __bad_udelay in network driver breaks build
>
>On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:05:13PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:52:30 +0200
>>
>> >
>> > Current Linus master x86-64 allyesconfig fails with
>> >
>> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tms380tr_chipset_init':
>> > tms380tr.c:(.text+0x10f02de): undefined reference to
>`__bad_udelay'
>> > tms380tr.c:(.text+0x10f03ab): undefined reference to
>`__bad_udelay'
>> > tms380tr.c:(.text+0x10f0400): undefined reference to
>`__bad_udelay'
>> > tms380tr.c:(.text+0x10f07b2): undefined reference to
>`__bad_udelay'
>> > tms380tr.c:(.text+0x10f08ed): undefined reference to
>`__bad_udelay'
>> > make[2]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>>
>> Let me know if this fixes things:
>
>Fixes that problem, but now I get (with Linus' latest again and a gcc
>4.6
>snapshot)
>
>In file included from /home/lsrc/git/linux-
>2.6/drivers/net/igbvf/ethtool.c:36:0:
>/home/lsrc/git/linux-2.6/drivers/net/igbvf/igbvf.h:129:15: error:
>duplicate member 'page'
>make[5]: *** [drivers/net/igbvf/ethtool.o] Error 1
>make[4]: *** [drivers/net/igbvf] Error 2
>
>struct igbvf_buffer {
>        dma_addr_t dma;
>        struct sk_buff *skb;
>        union {
>                /* Tx */
>                struct {
>                        unsigned long time_stamp;
>                        u16 length;
>                        u16 next_to_watch;
>                        u16 mapped_as_page;
>                };
>                /* Rx */
>                struct {
>                        struct page *page; <--------------- No 1
>                        u64 page_dma;
>                        unsigned int page_offset;
>                };
>        };
>        struct page *page;         <------------ No 2
>};
>
>Hmm conflict of a member with a transparent union.
>Maybe older gccs didn't catch that. But it looks very broken
>
>Alexander, can you sort out which "page" member should be used where?
>
>And there's another problem in SCSI which I'll report separately.
>
>-Andi

Yeah, I'm pretty sure the 2nd page pointer shouldn't be there.  We will look into correcting that.

Thanks,

Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html