[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101026.112321.258116003.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: lorenzo@...gle.com
Cc: brian.haley@...com, shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: addrconf: clear IPv6 addresses and routes when
losing link
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:17:27 -0700
> This works pretty well. Why not do the same for IPv6? The only
> difference in IPv6 is that the kernel is the one doing
> autoconfiguration, so it's the kernel that should be doing the asking.
That should be fine, but if I have static IPv6 addresses assigned to
an interface I really don't want them changing on a simple link flap.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists