[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288118920.2652.4.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 20:48:40 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ehea: Fixing statistics
Le mardi 26 octobre 2010 à 14:03 -0400, leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com a
écrit :
> @@ -2296,6 +2314,7 @@ static int ehea_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>
> ehea_post_swqe(pr->qp, swqe);
> pr->tx_packets++;
> + pr->tx_bytes += skb->len;
>
> if (unlikely(atomic_read(&pr->swqe_avail) <= 1)) {
> spin_lock_irqsave(&pr->netif_queue, flags);
This seems very suspicious to me. Lets take a look at this driver.
ehea_xmit3() frees the skb.
Yet, you happily use skb after it... kaboom...
Note: driver already uses skb after its freeing, before your patch.
if (vlan_tx_tag_present(skb)) {
swqe->tx_control |= EHEA_SWQE_VLAN_INSERT;
swqe->vlan_tag = vlan_tx_tag_get(skb);
}
How can it works ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists