[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101027.113537.15227235.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: paul.gortmaker@...driver.com
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, drosenberg@...curity.com,
jon.maloy@...csson.com, allan.stephens@...driver.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, security@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [Security] TIPC security issues
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:27:13 -0400
> I've got some patches from Al that I'm pre-reviewing/testing
> before spamming everyone with them (will send within 24h, if
> that is OK). Anyway, in the above, does it make sense to
> check for the overflow incrementally, i.e. something like this?
Can you please not work on this in private? That's the only reason
we have duplicated work here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists