[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1aam032f0.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:27:47 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: hadi@...erus.ca
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: netns patches WAS( Re: [PATCH 8/8] net: Implement socketat.
jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> writes:
> Eric,
>
> Ping?
> If you are too busy to push these in maybe have
> someone clueful like Daniel help out submitting? I think it
> should probably be reasonable to leave out the sockeat
> patch initially if it is deemed controversial..
This merge cycle I am too busy, and my patches did not make it into
linux-next before the merge window.
Everything except socketat at seems non-controversial. socketat makes
sense to post-pone a little bit until we start converting applications,
and there is a little real world experience about what is needed.
I anticipate some time freeing up in the next couple of weeks so I
should be ready for the next merge window.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists